Posture accept/reject — derived efficiency vs held scale-up

What to do

Posture accept/reject — derived efficiency or held scale-up.

Why

The gap is open and closing it is an efficiency job, not a scale-up job. Status: proposed — the contract file still holds scale-up; nothing may overwrite this except you explicitly accepting it. No money figure is on file for it. It is 17 day(s) past its ClickUp due date.

If you approve

I carry it out with the usual safety checks and post the proof on the ClickUp task.

If you deny

Nothing is done. The task is closed with your reason and it will not come back in the brief.

Where it is tracked

the ClickUp task

How it ends

Ends when the ClickUp task is closed.

Original wording: Posture accept/reject — derived efficiency vs held scale-up.

MODE6K weekly audit (2026-09-23) found BPS carrying an unaccepted posture_derived proposal in kpi_contracts.json: Current file posture: scale-up (hand-set) Proposed (derived 2026-09-15): efficiency Why: net +10,794.65 clears break-even but is short of the active rung target +13,905.01 — the gap is open and closing it is an efficiency job, not a scale-up job. Status: PROPOSED — the contract file still holds scale-up; nothing may overwrite this except the operator explicitly accepting it.